Endra Power Studio is one of the most ambitious new entrants in electrical building design software. Rather than adding automation to an established design platform, Endra is building a new, AI-powered MEP environment intended to generate models, calculations, and construction documents with much less manual work.
That vision deserves attention. It also raises a practical question for electrical engineers: How much of the electrical design process can Endra demonstrably handle today?
To answer that question, we are bringing back the Electrical Engineering BIM Scorecard. The scorecard uses ten yes-or-no questions to measure whether a BIM platform supports the work electrical engineers actually perform. For this review, we evaluated Endra using the company’s public website, product information, Revit documentation, founder interviews, and public posts available at the time of writing.
Because Endra is developing rapidly and is available through early-access and enterprise engagements, this score reflects publicly documented capabilities. A capability receives credit only when the available material clearly supports a “yes.” Broad claims about calculations or documentation are not treated as proof of a specific electrical engineering function.
What Is Endra Power Studio?
Endra describes its product as an AI-powered MEP platform that can generate models and documents at the click of a button. It is aimed at mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and fire protection designers, with the goal of bringing modeling, engineering calculations, documentation, and manufacturer data into one environment.
This is not simply an AI assistant added to Revit. Endra is its own cloud-based design engine. Users bring building information into Endra through formats including IFC, DXF, DWG, and PDF. Endra then performs design work in its platform and can export results to formats that include DXF, PDF, RVT, and IFC. Its Revit add-in maps Endra objects to a firm’s Revit families and imports the generated design into an open Revit model.
That distinction matters. Endra may integrate with Revit, but the engineering process is centered in Endra rather than performed directly in the Revit project. In a founder interview, CEO Niklas Lindgren described the company’s approach as bundling traditionally disconnected MEP tools into one platform and using agents to create designs. He also emphasized that the output is based on physics and simulation, with engineers remaining in control of the process.
Endra’s current public electrical message is concise: wire circuits, size cables, and export schedules automatically. Its broader platform claims include 2D and 3D model generation, automated documentation, collaboration, and Revit integration. These are meaningful claims, but the Electrical BIM Scorecard asks narrower questions about specific power-design deliverables and calculations.
Scoring Endra Power Studio
1. Does engineering exist? Yes.
Engineering is central to Endra’s positioning. The company presents the platform as purpose-built for MEP engineers, and its leadership consistently discusses automating engineering work rather than merely drafting or visualizing buildings.
2. Does MEP exist? Yes.
Endra explicitly addresses mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection, and related building systems. The platform is designed around MEP workflows and coordination.
3. Does electrical engineering exist? Yes.
Electrical systems are a named product area. Endra promotes automated circuit wiring, cable sizing, schedule exports, containment modeling, and lighting design. Electrical is not an incidental use of a general-purpose BIM modeler. It is one of the disciplines the platform is being built to serve.
4. Can you insert electrical devices? Yes.
Endra generates 2D and 3D system models and transfers modeled objects into Revit. Its published Revit workflow instructs users to map Endra object types to Revit families before importing the design. That is sufficient evidence that electrical components can be placed as part of a building model, even though the primary placement workflow occurs in Endra before the objects are brought into Revit.
5. Can you create a panel schedule? Not clearly documented.
Endra says it can wire circuits, size cables, and export schedules automatically. However, the public material we reviewed does not clearly identify a conventional electrical panel schedule, show its contents, or explain how panels, circuits, loads, phases, and breakers are represented.
An exported cable or equipment schedule is not necessarily a panel schedule. Because this scorecard question is intentionally specific, Endra does not receive the point without clearer documentation.
6. Can you perform a voltage drop calculation? Not clearly documented for power distribution.
Endra explicitly promotes voltage drop calculations for its fire alarm workflow. That confirms the platform can perform at least one form of voltage drop analysis, but it does not establish voltage drop calculations for building power circuits and feeders.
Cable sizing may account for voltage drop, but the public electrical product description does not explain the calculation method, circuit types supported, allowable limits, conductor properties, or report output. For purposes of the electrical power scorecard, this remains unverified.
7. Can you do panel load calculations? Not clearly documented.
The reviewed materials refer broadly to engineering calculations and automated design, but they do not document panel load calculations. There is no clear public explanation of connected load, demand load, phase balancing, feeder totals, or code-based load calculation methods for electrical panels.
8. Can you do a fault calculation? Not clearly documented.
We found no public documentation showing available fault current or short-circuit calculations for electrical distribution systems. This is a specialized engineering function, so a general claim of automated calculations is not enough to award the point.
9. Can you do a single-line diagram? Not clearly documented for electrical power.
Endra says its documentation engine can generate diagrams, and its fire alarm product specifically includes automatic riser diagrams. However, the reviewed materials do not clearly demonstrate an electrical power single-line diagram showing panels, transformers, feeders, protective devices, and distribution relationships.
A fire alarm riser and a power single-line diagram serve different engineering purposes. Endra does not receive this point based on the evidence currently available.
10. Can you do multi-family dwelling load calculations? Not clearly documented.
We found no public information showing multi-family dwelling load calculations or the application of the relevant NEC demand factors and calculation methods.
Endra Power Studio BIM Score: 4/10
Based on publicly documented capabilities, Endra Power Studio scores 4 out of 10 on the Electrical Engineering BIM Scorecard.
What the Score Means
A score of four means Endra passes the scorecard’s basic threshold for relevance to electrical engineers. It recognizes engineering, is purpose-built for MEP, directly targets electrical design, and can create modeled electrical content. That already separates it from architectural BIM tools that mention engineering only in passing or provide no electrical design workflow at all.
The score does not mean Endra lacks all of the remaining capabilities. It means the company’s public material does not yet establish them with enough specificity to award the points.
That distinction is especially important for a young platform. Endra’s strongest public demonstrations and case studies have focused heavily on fire alarm design, while the electrical power offering is described more briefly. The website also combines live, coming-soon, early-access, and beta messaging. Engineers evaluating the platform should therefore confirm which functions are available in their market, product configuration, and current release.
Endra’s approach is still noteworthy. Most established BIM workflows ask engineers to model inside a general-purpose platform and use separate applications for calculations, analysis, and documentation. Endra is attempting to replace that fragmented process with a purpose-built environment in which AI agents generate a substantial portion of the design. Its ability to import the result into Revit using a company’s own families could make the workflow more practical for firms whose deliverables must ultimately reside in Revit.
At the same time, integration is not the same as doing the engineering inside Revit. Firms considering Endra will need to decide whether they are comfortable moving design intelligence into a separate platform and then transferring the result into the project model. They should also test how revisions move between the two environments, how imported content complies with firm standards, and where the authoritative project data lives after changes occur.
The Bottom Line
Endra Power Studio presents a compelling vision for AI-assisted electrical engineering. It is not another architectural modeling package searching for an electrical use case. It is being built specifically for MEP design and aims to automate both modeling and engineering documentation.
Today, however, its public electrical power materials are stronger on the overall vision than on the specific calculations and deliverables measured by the Electrical Engineering BIM Scorecard. Endra clearly earns the first four points. Panel schedules, power-system voltage drop, panel load calculations, fault calculations, electrical single-line diagrams, and multi-family dwelling calculations remain insufficiently documented.
The result is a current score of 4/10. That places Endra at the threshold of serious consideration for electrical engineering, with considerable room to move higher as the company documents and releases more of its electrical power workflow.
For an established product, a four might indicate limited electrical depth. For Endra, it is better understood as an early score for an ambitious platform moving quickly. Electrical engineers should watch its development, but they should evaluate current, demonstrated capabilities separately from the broader promise of where the platform intends to go.
For more information on Endra Power Studio and to see how its electrical capabilities compares to ElectroBIM for Revit, we invite you to visit our webpage on the topic.